Genocide. The word conjures up images of widespread slaughter and mass unmarked graves. We see none of that today; so, why would anyone raise the alarm about White genocide? Before we tackle the matter of White genocide, let’s make sure we understand what genocide really means.
The legal definition of genocide is clearly spelled out by the United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility To Protect.
… genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Elements of the crime
… [The] crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. … which includes two main elements:
1. A mental element: the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”
We have the definition. Now, let’s see if that applies to the current situation of Whites, starting with “intent to destroy … ethnical, racial … group, as such”.
How would one go about destroying such a group? We can see two main strategies being employed right now.
Destruction of monuments and names in order to erase the memory of the group is happening on almost a weekly basis. Monuments to Southern heroes are vandalized and torn down by Leftist mobs, or removed by Leftist politicians. Names of streets and parks and buildings that once honored the memory of great Southern leaders are removed, while names like “Obama” and “M. L. King” replace them. The problem is not that other groups want to honor and memorialize their heroes – the problem is that it is a replacement of ours.
This is part of the strategy the Left uses to destroy a people. By destroying that which represents their history, that which honors their valor and accomplishments, and that which provides a tangible connection to the past, they leave the present and future generations cut off and adrift in the world. With no connection to their heritage, they lose their sense of identity. Without that sense of identity, it becomes very easy to convince people that they are simply “Citizens of the World”, and the triumph of Globalism will be assured.
Next on the list is “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part“.
How would the Left go about actually bringing about the “physical destruction in whole or in part”? Wholesale slaughter is highly unlikely since the long-term consequences would be crippling to an economy. The Left must consider the fact that when Whites have been removed from a country, it has always led to extreme poverty and chaos (witness Haiti, Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, and now South Africa). They had to come up with a better plan.
If they can’t destroy Whites outright, then the next best option for the Left is to destroy Whites by dilution – making Whites “less White” where the goal is a bland mixture of the races. It’s like taking a box of crayons and melting them. The collection of vibrant colors becomes an ugly greyish brown. Yes, it is slow, but Leftism has a history of embracing “The Long March”.
The goal of the Left is to encourage inter-racial relationships that produce mixed-race children. The method is biological engineering through social engineering.
Anyone paying any attention to advertising and entertainment media knows that mixed-race couples are made to appear far more common than they are in real life. When something is portrayed very differently from real life, there is always a reason.
Of children born to a White mother and a Black father, 97% are born out of wedlock, 98% receive no financial support from the father, and 97% have no active relationship with the father. Each of these is clearly bad for the children and for society, yet this is the same mix featured in a grossly disproportionate number of commercial advertisements. There is no logical reason to explain this as a more persuasive way to sell a product, so there must be something else at work.
In 1958, only 4% of Whites approved of marriage between Whites and Blacks, while in 2007, 75% approved. What changed? That kind of drastic change does not happen without massive efforts to persuade a population.
It is important to note that this is not just an attack on Whites. It is also an attack on Blacks, Hispanics, and every other race – in Western countries. The other races are also being diluted and erased. The non-White races will, of course, remain relatively pure in their native lands since “the blessings” of diversity are only demanded of White areas. There will, however, be no more native lands for Whites if the Left is allowed to succeed.
White genocide is very real. It’s just not obvious to those who refuse to see.